Thick and thin descriptions as an idea of Gilbert Ryle are
the classifications of depth intended as a result of someone’s action to
another person or nobody in particular. He uses an encompassing example of two
boys winking their eyelids. To one boy the wink is voluntary but to the other,
his wink is an involuntary twitch. The thin description is found easiest in the person’s
perception who’s observing the two boys action by still frame. You cannot negotiate
the motive of either action. This limited background gives us our thin
description. As we know more about the situation we can start to thicken up our
descriptions. Going further you can ask if they are “twitching, winking,
parodying, rehearsing” (p.289) etc. Of society this example can be used to show
“the piled up structures of inference and implication” (p.289) that we have
created of our society.
Clifford Geertz states that to study a society you must look at
“the first instance” (p.289). You have to understand the base that everything
is built on before you can evaluate and start making assumptions for other
actions. I think of this as a very large math problem. Say overall there are 20
steps between the start and finish, if you make a mistake on one number then
not only will the final result be wrong but every step after will be skewed
accordingly.
A favorite part of his explanation was a quote he included
from Ward Goodenough that says a society’s culture “consists of whatever it is
one has to know or believe in order to operate in a manner acceptable by its
members.” (p.290), this is where we get our understanding and motive for our
winks. Whether they are voluntary to imply something to another person, to mock
another person, to practice for when you see another person. It all contributes
to the thicker description. When we can understand the definition of one action
it helps us build the rest.
A simple picture of figuring out what's behind it all.
You did a great job explaining the ideas of Geertz. I also enjoy the picture that you included. Looking deeper into something to gather an explanation is essential; otherwise we're making assumptions on mere observations and not necessarily the truth. I also liked the math problem example. Good post!
ReplyDelete